Skip to main content

Heel Pricks Newborn Babies and Genetic Privacy violated In SA, NWReligion

 Heel Pricks Newborn Babies and Genetic Privacy violated In SA

 Image result for babies

DNA screening is illegal when you are an adult but can be done when you are a newborn infant, genetic experimentation and researches that boost State Health Government or contractor involvement.
This has been implemented as a law in other countries,
Screening is new born genetic testing and profiling the individual, the DNA is being used but for the first 6 months the blood is no more useful except for the value of the DNA, sequencing of the entire genetic blueprint of the child
SA Potchefstroom
" In addition, the PLIEM laboratory may facilitate in prenatal testing and testing of siblings of the index patient. The economic implication of prenatal and sibling testing depends on the family structure and financial abilities of the parents. Each case is unique and limited costs will be applied to ultimately support families in uncertain times. PLIEM also collaborates with various metabolic and genetic laboratories in Europe and America to provide additional specialised diagnostic tests at no or minimal costs (depending on the selection of tests for a specific
disorder).  While providing a vital, one-of-a-kind testing service in South Africa, the laboratory also – with the informed consent of parents – uses residual blood samples for further research on inherited metabolic disorders. The greater the knowledge base about these disorders in South Africa, the greater the prospect of assisting generations not yet born
PLIEM -We are offering this test as of 1 Augustus 2014. At the moment samples are sent to a laboratory in the USA, and from July 2015 this test will be conducted in our own laboratory.

Baby DNA considered National Treasure
"This nationwide collection of newborn DNA has been called a "national treasure" by Sharon Terry of the Genetic Alliance and referred to at the December 2009 forum as a "scientific goldmine" by Amy Gaviglio, a genetic counselor at the Minnesota Department of Health.

Increasingly, state health departments have begun to store newborn blood spots (Baby DNA) and newborn genetic test results and claim them as state government property. The test results are placed in a state laboratory database (genetic registry) and the blood spots are warehoused in the state health department or elsewhere by contract. For instance, the 4.2 million blood spots of Texas newborns were being stored at Texas A&M. 
In Minnesota, there are more than 1.5 million children listed with their genetic test results in the state's database. There are over 900,000 Minnesota children whose DNA is warehoused by the State with at least 70,000 children added per year.

The primary purpose for long-term storage of baby DNA and newborn genetic test results is research.


Newborn Genetic Screening Mandate

Every state has a mandatory newborn screening program to test for serious genetic disorders and genetic traits in newborns. Within 48 hours after the birth of a baby, the heel is pricked, newborn blood is squeezed onto a card with special filter paper, and the card is sent for analysis to the State government laboratory or the laboratory under contract with the State Department of Health. At least 4.0 million newborn babies are tested every year in the United States.

Parents are not asked before the newborn genetic testing is done. Most states mandate the testing. No consent is required. Some states allow parents to opt out of testing, particularly for religious reasons. However, parents are not usually informed that opting out is possible. In fact, most parents have no idea that the testing is even being done.
However, if they were given a choice, most parents would likely choose to have their child tested to speed up the diagnosis and treatment of these relatively rare newborn disorders.

This affirmation of newborn screening may change in the future as newborn screening advocates contemplate testing the baby's genome for childhood- or adult-onset diseases. One of the future concerns with newborn screening, as noted in 2008 by the President's Council on Bioethics (The Changing Moral Focus of Newborn Screening) and by Citizens' Council on Health Care, is the potential slide to eugenics.
If parents feel concerns about how their child's genetic test results may impact their children, their own choices, or their children's options in employment, insurance, or procreation, parents may begin to avoid testing or try to limit the number of conditions for which their child is tested. Already, some States mandate newborn genetic testing for a shorter list of conditions and allow parents to opt-out of testing for a secondary more controversial list of genetic conditions.
The screening of the baby provides insight into the genetic traits of the mother of the child, as described by Dr. Piero Rinaldo, M.D., director of the Mayo laboratory, at a forum on the use of residual (left-over) newborn dried blood spots ("Bloodspots, Genetic Research and Privacy" September 23, 2009 forum):
There’s actually an interesting collateral effect of newborn screening. More and more of the conditions that we screen for, now we’ve found that abnormal results in a baby is actually because the mother is affected....I think this could become an angle where we can actually bring to the attention of obstetricians that [it] is also their problem because sometimes newborn screening diagnoses not an affected child, but an affected mother. And it’s the mother who does have a condition that may or may not be symptomatic.
Dr. Alan Fleischman, MD, Medical Director of the March of Dimes, stated at the September 2009 forum the following basis for the state's authority to mandate the genetic testing of children:

YOur Rights
You have the right to take back the blood sample
you al;so have the right to do this in private
The Government has no right to store your DNA in a BIO Bank for Further Research without your consent

Stay Vigilant !


Popular posts from this blog

PROOF ! South Africa Weather and Drought Manipulated!!

South Africa : The weather is weird !? Throughout the country , a profound sweeping glance that South Africa is in its lowest rainfall ever.. Dying cattle, dying people, all starving with no outcome, but in the Free State.. Say isn't this where Monsanto has made their first Debut??
Its Murder all round, the weather is manipulated, proof that weather manipulation is quite possible. Am I pointing fingers at Monsanto? You be the Judge  The global corporate Giant Killer GMO is lurking, quietly modifying the weather , feeding people lots of money to do what they want them to do, After all money makes people do many things.

Maybe Monsanto is Fixing it??


South Africa recorded the driest year in over a century
In 2015, South Africa experienced its driest year in over 100 years, with rainfall below the mean in each of the last four years.
This is according to the South African weather service, which compiled a dataset detailing the average rainfall…

Chemtrails in South Africa Too?? Weather Manipulation Money Station!!! Read Now!!

referal post :

Yes, the US Government Has Experimented With Controlling Hurricanes  and now Chemtrails are weather related? NASA Admit Spraying Poisonous Chemtrails – NASA have admitted to spraying lethal chemtrails into our atmosphere – saying that lithium being sprayed into the Earths ionosphere helps to treat people with manic depression or bi-polar disorder.  NASA personnel have come forward saying that lithium, along with other potentially harmful chemicals, are intentionally sprayed into our environment regularly. reports:
NASA Confesses to Dosing Americans with Air-borne Lithium & Other Chemicals
referral article:           referral article:

Proof that South Africa Has Been Subjected to Geoengineering via the "Rainfall Enhancement Program" It's …

Osiris Marduk and State Capture of South Africa

Daily Maverick ref article : South Africans have been bombarded with revelations of how the state has been hijacked to amass wealth for a connected power elite involving President Jacob Zuma and the Gupta family

An academic research partnership has consolidated all available information into a frightening compendium on state capture, mapping the deals, the key players and the modus operandi for commandeering control of state institutions and parastatals. Their report shows why it is necessary for a judicial inquiry and criminal prosecution for corruption, fraud, money laundering, racketeering and, possibly, treason. It also shows the danger of key enablers such as Zuma, Finance Minister Malusi Gigaba and Eskom CEO Brian Molefe remaining in their posts

Alternative Revelations 
South Africa has undergone a cataclismic shift since the death of Mandela, in this article see the following, crazy as …